Performance and Capacity of River Basin Organizations
From WaterWiki
|
Performance and Capacity of River Basin Organizations: Cross-case Comparison of Four RBOs | |
|
Report | |
|
February 2008 | |
|
| |
|
Since the International Conference on Water and the Environment in Dublin in 1992, Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) has emerged as driving concept behind the management of water resources. The Global Water Partnership (2000) has defined IWRM as “a process, which promotes the coordinated development and management of water, land and related resources, in order to maximize the resultant economic and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems”. Although the concept of IWRM has been generally accepted, the actual implementation of IWRM has proven more difficult. Evidence suggests that the performance of recently established river basin organizations, with the aim of implementing IWRM, has been disappointing. Moreover, there appears to be widespread uncertainty about the role and functions of river basin organizations when it comes to the implementation of IWRM. The objective of the ‘Study on the performance and capacity of national river basin organisations’ is to address these issues and to identify priority capacity building actions and strategies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of RBOs. For this purpose, four RBO case studies were conducted, and major strengths, weaknesses, problems and successes in the implementation of the RBO’s roles and responsibilities towards sustainable management of water resources, were recorded and analysed.
| |
|
I. Summary Main Report 1. Introduction 10
2. River Basin Organizations 11
3. Cases and research methodology 21
4. Performance Assessment 24
5. Capacity building in the water sector 34
6. ANNEX 1: Mahaweli Ganga River Basin, Sri Lanka 42
7. ANNEX 2: Sungai Langat River Basin , Malaysia 47
8. ANNEX 3: Tana River Basin, Kenya 53
9. ANNEX 4: Lerma-Chapala-Santiago River Basin , Mexico 60
|
