Women and Water - Gender Dimension in Water Governance
From WaterWiki
|
Women are especially vulnerable to adverse impacts from climate change. Climate changes usually affect sectors traditionally associated with women; paddy cultivation, cotton and tea plantations and fishing. Prevailing social inequalities mean women typically have less adaptive capacity than men, and consequently bear a disproportionate burden of the climate change induced consequences. These include decreased food security, shortage of and reduced access to water resources and threatened existence, given their dependence on natural resources for their livelihoods. | |
|
Water is a basic element essential to all forms of life. Women are most often responsible for domestic and community water management in developing societies. On average:
It was recently cited that in South Africa alone, women collectively walk the equivalent distance of 16 times to the moon and back per day gathering water for families [2]. In this role, women are responsible for determining sources of water to collect, quantity of water to be taken and the water’s hygienic quality. However, in this era of globalization, women’s decisions in regard to water management are often dictated by their social position, geographic location and increasingly by market forces.
| |
A Gender Perspective on Water Resources and Sanitation This paper provides an overview, with examples and recommendations, of water supply and sanitation from a gender perspective.
GWA - Gender and IWRM Resource Guide This guide on gender and IWRM is meant as a reference document to assist water and gender practitioners and professionals as well as persons responsible for gender mainstreaming, and anybody else who is interested in the water sector.It is a reference guide that should be used in conjunction with the texts and materials to which it refers.
| |
|
| |
| |
|
[1] Bulajic Borjana, Women’s roles – a policy overview, Waterline, Vol.17 No.1, July 1998, p7 [2] Maude Barlow and Tony Clark, Water Apartheid, The Nation, Aug, 15 2002.
|
